Years ago when I described the George W. Bush regime as a police state, right-wing eyebrows were raised. When I described the Barack Obama regime as an even worse police state, liberals rolled their eyes. Alas! Now I am no longer controversial. Everybody says it.
According to the U.K. newspaper The Guardian, the Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel, had an angry exchange with Obama in which Merkel compared Obama’s National Security Agency (NSA) with the East German Communist Stasi, which spied on everyone through networks of informers.
Merkel grew up in Communist East Germany, where she was spied upon by the Stasi. And now that she has risen to the highest political office in Europe’s most powerful state, she is spied upon by “freedom and democracy” America.
A former top NSA official, William Binney, declared that “We (the U.S.) are now in a police state.” The mass spying conducted by the Obama regime, Binney says “is a totalitarian process.”
Perhaps my best vindication, after all the hate mail from “super patriots,” who wear their ignorance on their sleeves, and from Obama-worshipping liberals, whose gullibility is sickening, came from Federal judge Richard Leon, who declared the Obama-sanctioned NSA spying to be “almost Orwellian.” As the American Civil Liberties Union realized, Leon’s decision vindicated Edward Snowden by ruling that the NSA spying is likely outside what the Constitution permits, “labeling it ‘Orwellian’ — adding that James Madison would be ‘aghast.’”
If only more Americans were aghast. I sometimes wonder whether Americans like being spied upon, because it makes them feel important. “Look at me! I’m so important that the government spends enough money to wipe out U.S. poverty spying on me and my Facebook, et al., friends. I bet they are spending $1 billion just to know who I connected with today. I hope it didn’t get lost in all the spam.”
Being spied upon is the latest craze of people devoid of any future but desperate for attention.
Jason Ditz at the FBI spied-upon Antiwar.com says that Leon’s ruling is a setback for Obama, who was going to restore justice and liberty but instead created the American Stasi spy state. Congress, of course, loves the spy state, because all the capitalist firms that make mega-millions or mega-billions of dollars from it generously finance Congressional and Senatorial campaigns for those who support the Stasi state.
The romance that libertarians and “free market economists” have with capitalism, which buys compliance with its greed and cooperates with the Stasi state, is foolish.
Let’s move on. It was only a few weeks ago that Obama and his Secretary of State, John Kerry, were on the verge of attacking Syria on the basis of faked evidence that Syria had crossed the “red line” and used weapons of mass destruction against the American-organized, -armed and -financed “rebels,” almost all of whom come from outside Syria.
Only the bought-and-paid-for-by-Washington French president made a show of believing a word or Washington’s lies against the Assad government in Syria. The British Parliament, long a puppet of Washington, gave Obama the bird and voted down participating in another American war crime. That left U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron, hanging. Where do the British get prime ministers like Cameron and Tony Blair?
Washington’s plan for Syria, having lost the cover of its British puppet, received a fatal blow from Russian President Putin, who arranged for Syria’s chemical weapons to be delivered to foreign hands for destruction, thus putting an end to the controversy.
In the meantime, it became apparent that the “Syrian rebellion” organized by Washington has been taken over by al-Qaida, an organization allegedly responsible for 9/11. Even Washington was able to figure out that it didn’t make sense to put al-Qaida in charge of Syria. Now the headlines are: “West tells Syria rebels: Assad must stay.”
Meanwhile, Washington’s arrogance has managed to make an enemy of India. The Transportation Security Administration, a component of Homeland Security, subjected a female diplomat from India to multiple strip searches and cavity searches and ignored her protestations of consular immunity.
There was no justification whatever for this abuse of an Indian diplomat. To indicate its displeasure, the Indian government has removed barriers that prevent truck bombs from being driven into the U.S. embassy.
Washington has managed to recreate the arms race: more profits for the military/security complex and less security for the world. Provoked by Washington’s military aggressiveness, Russia has announced a $700 billion upgrade of its nuclear ballistic missiles. China’s leaders have also made it clear that China is not intimidated by Washington’s intrusion into China’s sphere of influence. China is developing weapon systems that make obsolete Washington’s large investment in surface fleets.
Recently, Pat Buchanan, Mr. Conservative himself, made a case that Russia’s Putin better represents traditional American values than does the President of the United States.
Buchanan has a point. It is Washington, not Moscow or Beijing, that threatens to bomb countries into the Stone Age, that forces down airplanes of heads of state and subjects them to searches, and that refuses to honor grants of political asylum.
Certainly, Washington’s claim to be “exceptional” and “indispensable” and, therefore, above law and morality contrasts unfavorably with Putin’s statement that “we do not infringe on anyone’s interests or try to teach anyone how to live.”
Washington’s arrogance has brought America disrepute. What damage will Washington next inflict on us?
–Paul Craig Roberts